Cancer Cell, vol 9, no. 3, pp. 189-198, March 2006
DOI 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.01.025
http://www.cancercell.org/content/article/abstract?uid=PIIS153561080600033X

"Unique microRNA molecular profiles in lung cancer diagnosis and prognosis".

Nozomu Yanaihara 1, Natasha Caplen 2, Elise Bowman 1, Masahiro Seike 1, Kensuke Kumamoto 1, Ming Yi 3, Robert M. Stephens 3, Aikou Okamoto 4, Jun Yokota 5, Tadao Tanaka 4, George Adrian Calin 6, Chang-Gong Liu 6, Carlo M. Croce 6, and Curtis C. Harris 1,

1 Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
2 Gene Silencing Section, Office of Science and Technology Partnership, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
3 Advanced Biomedical Computing Center, National Cancer Institute-Frederick/SAIC-Frederick Inc., Frederick, Maryland 21702
4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan
5 Biology Division, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
6 Molecular Virology, Immunology and Medical Genetics, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio 43210

Corresponding author: Curtis C. Harris: Ph: 301 496 2048; Fax: 301 496 0497
curtis_harris@nih.gov



NetworkEditor's Perspective: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Deficiency Disease ?
Summary:
Significance:
Introduction:
Results:
Table 1: Comparison analysis of clinicopathologic classifications.
Table 2: 43 miRNAs differentially expressed in lung cancer tissues versus noncancerous lung tissues.
Fig. 1: Validation of the microarray data by the solution hybridization method and by real-time RT-PCR.
Fig. 2: Kaplan-Meier survival curves for adenocarcinoma patients (mature forms of microRNAs).
Table 3: Survival related to clinicopathologic characteristics and miRNA expression (microarrays).
Table 4: Survival related to clinicopathologic characteristics and miRNA expression (RT-PCR analysis).
Fig. 3: Kaplan-Meier survival curves for adenocarcinoma patients (precursor forms of microRNAs).
Conclusion:
Experimetal Procedures:
Supplemental Data:
Acknowledgements:
References:
Additional References:
Further Topics:
Other Links:
Further Information:



Summary

MicroRNA (miRNA) expression profiles for lung cancers were examined to investigate miRNA's involvement in lung carcinogenesis. miRNA microarray analysis identified statistical unique profiles, which could discriminate lung cancers from noncancerous lung tissues as well as molecular signatures that differ in tumor histology. miRNA expression profiles correlated with survival of lung adenocarcinomas, including those classified as disease stage I. High hsa-mir-155 and low hsa-let-7a-2 expression correlated with poor survival by univariate analysis as well as multivariate analysis for hsa-mir-155. The miRNA expression signature on outcome was confirmed by real-time RT-PCR analysis of precursor miRNAs and crossvalidated with an independent set of adenocarcinomas. These results indicate that miRNA expression profiles are diagnostic and prognostic markers of lung cancer.

Citing Articles:
"The Diverse Functions of MicroRNAs in Animal Development and Disease".
Wigard P. Kloosterman and Ronald H.A. Plasterk
Developmental Cell, 2006, 11:4:441-450
[Summary] [Full Text] [PDF]




Significance:

miRNAs are a class of small noncoding RNA genes found to be abnormally expressed in several types of cancer, suggesting that miRNAs play a substantial role in the pathogenesis of human cancers. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in the world, reflecting the need for a better understanding of the mechanisms that underlie lung carcinogenesis. Although focusing on known genes and proteins has already yielded new information, unknown markers may also lend insight into the biology of lung cancer. We showed that lung cancer has extensive alterations of miRNA expression that may deregulate cancer-related genes. Furthermore, the miRNA molecular signature of lung adenocarcinomas, including those without evidence of metastasis, also correlates with patient survival.




Introduction

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in the world, and its etiology is primarily genetic and epigenetic damage caused by tobacco smoke (Travis et al., 2004). Systematic analysis of mRNA and protein expression levels among thousands of genes has also contributed to defining the molecular network of
lung carcinogenesis (Meyerson and Carbone, 2005; Granville and Dennis, 2005). Defects in both the p53 and RB/p16 path-ways are common in lung cancer. Several other genes, such as K-ras, PTEN, FHIT, and MYO18B, are genetically altered, though less frequently (Minna et al., 2002; Sekido et al., 2003; Yokota and Kohno, 2004). Although focusing on known genes and proteins has already yielded new information, previously unknown markers such as noncoding RNA gene products may also lend insight into the biology of lung cancer.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNA gene products about 22 nt long that are found in diverse organisms and play key roles in regulating the translation and degradation of mRNAs through base pairing to partially complementary sites, predominately in the untranslated region of the message (Lagos-Quintana et al., 2001; Lau et al., 2001; Lee and Ambros, 2001). miRNAs are expressed as long precursor RNAs that are processed by a cellular nuclease, Drosha, before being transported by an Exportin-5-dependent mechanism into the cytoplasm (Yi et al., 2003; Gregory and Shiekhattar, 2005). Once in the cytoplasm, miRNAs are cleaved further by the enzyme DICER (Lee et al., 2002, 2003), and this results in 17–24 nt miRNAs that are associated with a cellular complex that is similar to the RNA-induced silencing complex that participates in RNA interference (Hutvagner and Zamore, 2002). Recently, it was reported that DICER expression levels were reduced in a fraction of lung cancers with a significant prognostic impact on patient survival (Karube et al., 2005). The biological functions of most miRNAs are not yet fully understood. It has been suggested that the miRNAs are involved in various biological processes, including cell proliferation, cell death, stress resistance, and fat metabolism, through the regulation of gene expression (Ambros, 2003).

Our understanding of miRNA expression patterns and function in normal or neoplastic human cells is just starting to emerge. miRNA genes are frequently located at fragile sites (FRAs), as well as in minimal regions of loss of heterozygosity, minimal regions of amplification, or common breakpoint regions, suggesting that miRNAs might be a new class of genes involved in human tumorigenesis (Calin et al., 2004b). For example,
mir-15-a and mir-16-1 are frequently deleted and/or down-regulated in patients with B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (Calin et al., 2002). Other links between cancer and miRNA have been reported, including reduced expression of mir-143 and mir-145 in colorectal cancers (Michael et al., 2003) and let-7 in lung cancers (Takamizawa et al., 2004), high expression of the precursor mir-155 in Burkitt’s lymphomas (Metzler et al., 2004), and oncogenic function of mir-17-92 cluster in human B cell lymphomas as well as in lung cancers (He et al., 2005; Hayashita et al., 2005). The precise mechanisms regulating miRNA expression are unknown. However, several mechanisms, including genetic and epigenetic alteration, might affect miRNA expression, and they may lead to alterations in the pattern of target genes expression in cancers. It was shown that miRNA expression patterns have relevance to the biological and clinical behavior of human B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia and solid tumors, including breast cancers (Calin et al., 2004a; Iorio
et al., 2005; Volinia et al., 2006). One or more members of the let-7 family regulate RAS expression in human cells, and thus, let-7 may play a major role in human lung carcinogenesis as a tumor suppressor gene (Johnson et al., 2005). Recently, miRNA expression profiles have been shown to be potential tools for
cancer diagnosis (Lu et al., 2005). These and other data are consistent with the hypothesis that miRNAs play a substantial role in the pathogenesis of human cancers.

In this study, we investigated the miRNA expression profiles in human lung cancer and miRNA regulation by epigenetic mechanisms and found that the miRNA molecular profile of lung adenocarcinoma correlates with patient survival.

Results

Altered miRNA expression in primary lung cancers and identification of miRNAs associated with clinicopathological features of lung cancer

We analyzed the miRNA expression in 104 pairs of primary lung cancers and corresponding noncancerous lung tissues. We compared miRNA expression of several group pairs as listed in Table 1.


Expression profiles were generated by comparing lung cancers, except when comparing lung cancer tissues with corresponding noncancerous lung tissues. We identified miRNAs, which were expressed differently in phenotypical and histological classifications (Table 1). When we compared miRNA expression among lung cancer tissues versus corresponding noncancerous lung tissues, 43 miRNAs had statistical differences in
expression between groups (Table 2).

In class comparison analysis using our microarray analysis tool, the multivariate permutation test was performed to control multiple comparisons. It provides a specific confidence level for ensuring that the number of false discoveries does not exceed a target level or for ensuring that the proportion of the gene list that are false discoveries does not exceed a target level. Thus, the probability of identifying at least 43 miRNAs by chance at the <0.001 level, if there are no real differences between the classes, was 0 as estimated by the multivariate permutation test. Furthermore, 91% of 104 lung cancers were correctly classified using the leave-one-out crossvalidated class prediction method based on the compound covariate predictor. Based on 2000 random permutations, the p value, which is defined as the proportion of the random permutations that gave a crossvalidated error rate no greater than the crossvalidated error rate with the real data, was < 0.0005.

Several of these miRNAs were associated with FRAs (Table 2). In particular, three miRNAs are located inside FRAs (hsa-mir-21 at FRA17B, hsa-mir-27b at FRA9D, and hsa-mir-32 at FRA9E). Furthermore, many of these miRNAs are located at frequently deleted or amplified regions in several malignancies (Table 2). For example, hsa-mir-21 and hsa-mir-205 are located at the region amplified in lung cancer, whereas hsa-mir-126* and hsa-mir-126 are at 9q34.3, a region deleted in lung cancer. Reduced expression of precursor let-7a-2 and let-7f-1 was also found in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma at a p value cutoff of 0.05, respectively. In the same way, comparison analyses between lung adenocarcinoma versus noncancerous tissues and squamous cell carcinoma versus noncancerous tissues revealed 17 and 16 miRNAs with statistically different expression, respectively (Table S2 in the Supplemental Data available with this article online). Six miRNAs (hsa-mir-21, hsa-mir-191, hsa-mir-155, hsa-mir-210, has-mir-126*, and hsa-mir-224) were shared in both histological types of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).

Next, we asked whether the microarray data revealed specific molecular signatures for subsets of lung cancer that differ in clinical behavior. For this analysis, we examined the relationship of five types of clinical and pathological information (Table 1). Among them, we identified six miRNAs (hsa-mir-205, hsa-mir-99b,
hsa-mir-203, hsa-mir-202, hsa-mir-102, and hsa-mir-204-prec) that were expressed differently in the two most common histological types of NSCLC, adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. The expression levels of hsa-mir-99b and hsa-mir-102 were higher in adenocarcinoma. No miRNAs were identified as differently expressed when classified by age, gender, or race in our data set.

Validation of the microarray data by the solution hybridization detection method and real-time

RT-PCR analysis

We used the solution hybridization detection method for mature miRNAs and real-time RT-PCR analysis for precursor miRNAs to validate the results from microarray analysis. First, the microarray data of three miRNAs (hsa-mir-21, hsa-mir-126*, and hsa-mir-205) were analyzed by the solution hybridization detection
method. Seven pairs of primary lung cancers and corresponding noncancerous lung tissues in which sufficient RNA was available were analyzed. The mature forms of hsa-mir-21 and hsa-mir-205 were clearly upregulated in lung cancer tissues when compared with the corresponding noncancerous lung tissues
(Figure 1A).

In contrast, hsa-mir-126* was downregulated in most of the lung cancer tissues examined. Therefore, the analyses confirmed the microarray data for these three miRNAs.

We also performed real-time RT-PCR analysis of precursor miRNAs. First, cDNA from 16 pairs of lung adenocarcinoma and 16 pairs of lung squamous cell carcinoma was prepared by gene-specific primers (hsa-mir-21, hsa-mir-126*, hsa-mir-205, and U6), and then, real-time RT-PCR analysis for these miRNAs and an endogenous control were performed. At least 2-fold upregulation of precursor hsa-mir-21 and hsa-mir-205 expression was found in 66% and 56% out of 32 cases, respectively, when compared with that in the corresponding noncancerous tissues. The differences were statistically significant at p < 0.001 by paired Student’s t test (Figure 1B). On the other hand, 31% of 32 cases examined were found to exhibit >50%
reduction in precursor hsa-mir-126* expression even though the reduction was not statistically significant (Figure 1B). These findings show the frequent occurrence of either upregulation or a reduction of specific precursor miRNAs in lung cancers, as was seen in the mature miRNAs by using microarray analysis.

Correlation between miRNA expression profiles and prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma patients

We next investigated the correlation of miRNA expression profiles with patient survival. A univariate Cox proportional hazard regression model with global permutation test in BRB-Array-Tools indicated that eight miRNAs (hsa-mir-155, hsa-mir-17-3p, hsa-mir-106a, hsa-mir-93, hsa-let-7a-2, hsa-mir-145, hsa-let-7b, and hsa-mir-21) were related to the adenocarcinoma patient’s survival. Patients with high expression of either hsa-mir-155, hsa-mir-17-3p, hsa-mir-106a, hsa-mir-93,or hsa-mir-21 and low expression of either hsa-let-7a-2, hsa-let-7b,or hsa-mir-145 were found to have a significantly worse prognosis. In addition, the survival analysis among the 41 stage I adenocarcinoma patients revealed that three miRNAs (hsa-mir-155, hsa-mir-17-3p, and hsa-mir-20) were associated with patient out-come. This indicated the important relationship between miRNA expression profiles and patient survival, independent of disease stage.

Because five miRNAs (hsa-mir-155, hsa-mir-17-3p, hsa-let-7a-2, hsa-mir-145, and hsa-mir-21) out of these miRNAs were expressed differently among lung cancer tissues versus corresponding noncancerous lung tissues, these miRNAs were used for further survival analysis. The ratio of lung cancer expression to corresponding noncancerous lung tissue expression for each of these five miRNAs was calculated, and the
cases were classified according to the expression ratio. Using these groupings for each miRNA, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates showed that the lung adenocarcinoma patients with either high hsa-mir-155 or reduced hsa-let-7a-2 expression had a poorer survival than the patients with low hsa-mir-155 or high hsa-let-7a-2 expression, respectively (Figure 2).

The difference in the prognosis of these two groups was statistically significant for hsa-mir-155 (p = 0.006; log-rank test) and marginally significant for hsa-let-7a-2 (p = 0.033; log-rank test). Survival analysis of the clinico-pathological factors showed that stage was associated with survival (p = 0.01; log-rank test), while age, sex, and smoking history did not account for poor prognosis (Table 3).

To adjust for multiple comparisons, we used the method by Storey and Tibshirani (2003), limiting the false discovery rates to 0.05. When this rate was used, hsa-mir-155 and disease stage were still statistically significant. Subsequently, a multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis using all of these clinicopathological and molecular factors indicated that high hsa-mir-155 expression was a significantly unfavorable prognostic factor independent of other clinicopathological factors (p = 0.027; risk ratio 3.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13–8.14) in addition to disease stage (p = 0.013; risk ratio 3.27; 95% CI,
1.31–8.37) (Table 3).

To investigate the biological consequence of altered hsa-mir-155 and hsa-let-7a-2 expression, we conducted a bioinformatic analysis grouping the predicted targets of these miRNAs by Gene Ontology (GO) terms (Table S2). In addition to associations with more general functional GO terms, a significant enrichment for targets associated with transcription was seen for hsa-mir-155. hsa-let-7a showed an overrepresentation of gene targets linked with protein kinase and intracellular signaling cascades, a finding consistent with the reported functional interaction between let-7 and RAS (Johnson et al., 2005).

Validation of miRNA expression signature on lung adenocarcinoma patient survival using an independent
set of adenocarcinoma patients

Real-time RT-PCR analysis was performed for hsa-mir-155 and hsa-let-7a-2 to determine whether the precursor miRNA expression also had a prognostic impact on adenocarcinoma patients. First, 32 pairs of adenocarcinomas from the original set, in which RNA was available, were subjected to real-time RT-PCR analysis. The ratio of lung cancer expression to corresponding noncancerous lung tissue expression was calculated, and the cases were classified according to the expression ratio. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (Figures S1A and S1B) demonstrated a significantly worse survival for patients with either high precursor hsa-mir-155 expression (p = 0.047; log-rank test) or reduced precursor hsa-let-7a-2 expression (p = 0.037;
log-rank test) (Table 4).

To further validate the prognosis classifiers described here, we analyzed an additional independent set of 32 adenocarcinomas using real-time RT-PCR analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves (Figures S1C and S1D) showed a clear relationship in precursor hsa-mir-155 expression (p =0.033; log-rank test) and approached significance in hsa-let-7a-2 expression (p = 0.084; log-rank test) in this cohort as well (Table 4). In addition, high precursor hsa-mir-155 expression was found to be an independent predictor of poor prognosis by a multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis (Table 4). To further confirm if there was any grouping bias between the original set and the additional set, we performed univariate and multivariate survival analyses for all 64 cases. Consistently, these analyses showed the significance of precursor
hsa-mir-155 expression (Table 4; Figure 3A).

Of note, reduced precursor hsa-let-7a-2 expression also had a similar prognostic impact on adenocarcinoma patients (Table 4; Figure 3B) consistent with a previous report (Takamizawa et al., 2004).

Lack of epigenetic regulation of miRNA expression in NSCLC cell lines

We employed miRNA microarray to analyze the changes in miRNA expression after 5-aza-2 -deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC) and/or Trichostatin A (TSA) treatment in two lung cancer cell lines, A549 and NCI-H157. Although we could confirm reexpression of a known transcriptional-silenced gene (MYO18B) as a positive control (Figure S2), none of the miRNAs showed a statistically significant change in increased expression after treatment with 5-aza-dC and/or TSA, suggesting that hypermethylation and histone deacetylation were not responsible for the reduced miRNA expression in at least these two cells.

Discussion

Little is known about the expression levels or function of miRNAs in normal and neoplastic cells, although it is becoming clear that miRNAs play major roles in the regulation of gene expression during development (Ambros, 2003; McManus, 2003). We reported here that the genome-wide expression profiling of miRNAs was significantly different among primary lung cancers and corresponding noncancerous lung tissues. The microarray data were validated by both solution hybridization detection method for mature miRNAs and real-time RT-PCR analysis for precursor miRNAs. Several of the miRNAs identified as differentially expressed are located inside FRAs and/or in the chromosomal regions where genomic imbalance in lung cancers has been observed previously with high frequency. As FRAs are preferential sites of translocation, deletion, amplification, or integration of exogenous genome, it is possible that miRNAs located near FRAs could be possible targets of such genomic alteration. Even though there is the possibility that the differences in miRNA expression may simply be a surrogate for cytogenetic changes in lung cancers, the fact that >50% of miRNAs are located at cancer-related chromosomal regions supported the idea that miRNAs may play a role as oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes. Moreover, these miRNAs are suggested to be involved in cancer. High expression of mir-155 was found in Burkitt’s lymphoma and B cell lymphomas (Metzler et al., 2004; Eis et al., 2005). It was also reported that mir-143 and mir-145 are reduced in colon cancer (Michael et al., 2003). The potential involvement of reduced let-7 expression in lung cancers has been reported by two different groups (Takamizawa et al., 2004; Johnson et al., 2005). Consistent with a previous report, we also found reduced expression of precursor hsa-let-7a-2 and let-7f-1 in our data set. Overexpression of mir-17-92 cluster was recently reported in lung cancers, especially in those with small cell lung cancers (Hayashita et al., 2005).

Precise molecular mechanisms for the altered expression of miRNAs in lung cancers are unclear. Abnormal expression of miRNAs in lung cancers could be caused by somatic genetic alterations. Alternatively, the reduced expression of miRNAs in lung cancer could be caused by epigenetic change such as DNA methylation and alterations of chromatin structure, which are important processes of transcriptional silencing in many genes, including tumor suppressor genes, and as an alternative to genetic defects in human carcinogenesis (Jones and Baylin, 2002; Eberharter and Becker, 2002). The comparison of miRNA
expression between 5-aza-dC- and/or TSA-treated and parental cell lines is a feasible approach for the identification of differentially expressed cancer-related miRNAs. However, the involvement of the epigenetic regulation for miRNA expression is unlikely in at least the two NSCLC cell lines we studied. Recently,
it was shown that the expression of miRNAs may be transcriptionally linked to the expression of other genes, coding for both proteins and noncoding RNAs (Rodriguez et al., 2004; Baskerville and Bartel, 2005). Indeed, approximately 30% of the 43 miRNAs that showed different expression in lung cancer tissue versus noncancerous lung tissue are located within exons or introns of known protein-coding genes, such as TMEM49 (transmembrane protein 49) for hsa-mir-21, EGFL7 (EGF-like-domain, multiple 7) for hsa-mir-126* and hsa-mir-126, GABRE (g-amino-butyric acid [GABA] A receptor, epsilon) for hsa-mir-224 and SLIT3 (slit homolog 3) for hsa-mir-218-2. TMEM49 is in a 17q23 amplicon that also contains the PPM1D (protein phosphatase 1D magnesium-dependent, delta isoform; Wip1) (Bulavin et al., 2002), which encodes Ser/Thr protein phosphatase, inactivates p53 tumor suppressor activity, and facilitates RAS-and
ERBB2-induced murine mammary tumors (Bulavin et al., 2004). Increased PPM1D expression has not been previously detected in human lung cancer. EGFL7 is expressed at high levels in the vasculature of proliferative tissue and is downregulated in mature vessels in the normal adult tissue (Parker et al., 2004). Future studies will determine the correlation between the expression of these exonic or intronic miRNAs and their host genes in lung cancers.

The global expression profile of miRNAs with Cox proportional hazard regression analysis could identify miRNAs that were associated with adenocarcinoma patient survival. The finding that expression of the five miRNAs (hsa-mir-155, hsa-mir-17-3p, hsa-let-7a-2, hsa-mir-145, and hsa-mir-21) is statistically altered in lung cancers and also has a prognostic impact on the survival warrants additional studies to investigate how
altered miRNA expression would manifest the biological consequences in the development and/or progression of human cancers. It was recently reported that hsa-mir-21 can function as an antiapoptotic factor in cultured glioblastoma cells (Chan et al., 2005). Because hsa-mir-21 expression was upregulated significantly in lung cancer tissues, it was speculated that aberrant increased expression of the miRNA might block the expression of gene products that induce apoptosis and might be related to lung carcinogenesis. Interestingly, high hsa-mir-155 expression had a significantly worse prognostic impact on adenocarcinoma
patients as an independent risk factor and therefore could serve as a marker for survival. A unique 13 miRNA expression signature including hsa-mir-155 was also a prognostic factor of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (Calin et al., 2005). Although mir-155 is overexpressed in several types of human cancer, its
biological function remains still uncertain. However, a previous study has shown that BIC (host gene of hsa-mir-155) is implicated as a collaborator with c-myc in an avian lymphoma model system (Tam et al., 2002). We were able to crossvalidate the clinical importance of outcome predictive miRNAs (hsa-mir-155
and hsa-let-7a-2) using an independent additional case by real-time RT-PCR analysis. Again, a multivariate analysis revealed that high precursor hsa-mir-155 expression independently contributed to patient outcome. In our study, only hsa-let-7a- 2 of the let-7 family marginally correlated with prognosis in the original set of adenocarcinomas by miRNA microarray analysis. The hsa-let-7a-2 expression data remained statistically
sufficient in the original set of adenocarcinomas and was not statistically significant in the second independent set by real-time RT-PCR analysis. However, reduced hsa-let-7a-2 expression correlated with poor survival by univariate analysis as well as multivariate analysis in the combined set of two independent
cohorts, suggesting that it is a prognostic factor in lung cancer, consistent with a previous report (Takamizawa et al., 2004; Johnson et al., 2005).

Several publications have presented algorithms with which to identify putative targets for miRNA (Lewis et al., 2003; John et al., 2004). However, the prediction and validation of target mRNAs by computerized means and experimental approaches is a still unresolved task. Recently, it was shown that the let-7 family negatively regulates RAS in C. elegans as well as human cells, and the downregulation of let-7 could result in the upregulation of RAS and induce oncogenesis in human lung cancer (Johnson et al., 2005). The GO analysis that we conducted for putative targets of let-7a was consistent with these findings, showing an association with target transcripts involved in the intracellular signaling. In addition, our GO analysis for hsa-mir-155 suggests a role for this miRNA in regulating target transcripts associated with transcription. Besides this GO analysis, the web-based computational approaches to predict gene targets were performed for hsa-mir-155 (miRBase Targets BETA Version 1.0, PicTar predictions, and TargetScan). Table S3 shows ten putative target genes that were commonly predicted by three different programs and indicates that the cancer-associated genes are potentially regulated by this miRNA. However, additional studies are needed to identify the targets of the miRNAs and to experimentally correlate them with lung carcinogenesis.

In conclusion, human lung cancer has extensive alterations of miRNA expression that may deregulate cancer-related genes. The miRNA molecular profiles of lung adenocarcinoma also correlate with patient survival.

Experimental procedures

Samples

One hundred and four pairs of primary lung cancers and corresponding noncancerous lung tissues were used in this study. An additional 32 cases, which could be followed up until 5 years, were used for an independent validation data set. These specimens were obtained from patients in the Baltimore metropolitan area from 1990 to 1999 with informed consent and IRB agreement. For the majority of samples, clinical and biological information was available. Total RNA were isolated by TRIzol (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s
instructions.

Microarray analysis

Microarray analysis was performed as previously described (Liu et al., 2004). Briefly, 5 mg of total RNA was used for hybridization on miRNA microarray chips containing 352 probes in triplicate. The microarrays were hybridized in 6 SSPE (0.9 M NaCl/60 mM NaH2 PO4 2H2O/ 8 mM EDTA [pH 7.4])/ 30% formamide at 25ºC for 18 hr, washed in 0.75 TNT (Tris-HCl/NaCl/ Tween 20) at 37ºC for 40 min, and processed by using a method of direct detection of the biotin-containing transcripts by streptavidin-Alexa 647 conjugate. Processed slides were scanned using a PerkinElmer ScanArray XL5K Scanner.

An average value of the three spot replicates of each miRNA was normalized and analyzed in BRB-ArrayTools version 3.2.3. After excluding negative values with hybridization intensity below background, normalization was performed by using the median normalization method and normalization to median array as reference. Finally, we selected 147 miRNAs with consistent log values present in more than 50% of the samples. We identified genes that were differently expressed among groups using Student’s t tests or F tests, and genes were considered statistically significant if their p value was less than 0.001. We also performed a global test of whether the expression profiles differed between the groups by permuting the labels of which arrays corresponded to which groups. For each permutation, the p values were recomputed,
and the number of genes significant at the 0.001 level was noted. The proportion of the permutations that gave at least as many significant genes as with the actual data was the significance level of the global test.

For phenotypical and histological comparisons, we performed the class prediction analysis based on the compound covariate predictor. We estimated the prediction error using leave-one-out crossvalidation. We also evaluated whether the crossvalidated error rate for a model was significantly less than one would expect from random prediction. The class labels were randomly permutated, and the entire leave-one-out crossvalidation process was repeated 2000 times. All data were submitted to the ArrayExpress data-base,
and the accession number are E-TABE-22.

Solution hybridization detection analysis and real-time RT-PCR analysis

The expression levels of mature miRNAs were measured by solution hybridization detection method with mirVana miRNA Detection Kit (Ambion Inc., TX). Briefly, total RNA (1 mg) was incubated with radiolabeled probes, which were prepared by 5' end labeling by T4 Polynucleotide Kinase. Following digestion to remove the probe that was not bound by target miRNA, the radiolabeled products were fractionated by denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

Real-time RT-PCR analysis was performed as described (Schmittgen et al., 2004). Briefly, RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA with gene-specific primers and Thermoscript, and the relative amount of each miRNA
to tRNA for initiator methionine was described, using the equation 2-dCT, where dCT =(CTmiRNA - CTU6 ). The probe and primer sequences are available upon request.

5-aza-dC and/or TSA treatment

For the first 48 hr, A549 and NCI-H157 cells (American Tissue Culture Collection) were incubated with medium containing 1.0 mM 5-aza-dC (Sigma); the cells were then incubated for another 24 hr with the addition of 1.0 mM TSA (Sigma). Total RNA was isolated, and then microarray analysis was performed
as described above. Each treatment was performed in triplicate.

Survival analysis

We identified genes whose expression was significantly related to survival of the patient. We computed a statistical significance level for each gene based on a univariate Cox proportional hazard regression model in BRB-ArrayTools version 3.2.3. These p values were then used in a multivariate permutation test in which the survival times and censoring indicators were randomly permuted among arrays. Genes were considered statistically significant if their p value was less than 0.05.

The survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the resulting curves were compared using the log-rank test. The joint effect of covariables was examined using the Cox proportional hazard regression model. Statistical analysis was performed using StatMate (ATMS Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).

GO analysis

Predicted targets of hsa-mir-155 and hsa-let-7a were determined by the methods of Lewis et al. (2005) and PicTar (Krek et al., 2005) and were analyzed with respect to the overrepresentation within different biological grouping categories including GO. Briefly, the predicted target gene lists were subjected to analysis using WholePathwayScope (WPS) (Yi et al., 2006). The level of overrepresentation is measured based on Fisher’s exact test on a 2 X 2 contingency table for each GO term (whether a gene is in the given
list or not versus whether this gene is associated with a GO term or not). Then, Fisher’s exact test p values were computed for each term in each GO and ranked from smaller to higher values to estimate the statistical significance and priority for each term. Those terms with Fisher’s exact test p values less than 0.005 were listed.

Supplemental data

The Supplemental Data include two supplemental figures and three supplemental tables and can be found with this article online at http://www.cancercell.org/cgi/content/full/9/3/189/DC1/.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Xin Wang for helpful discussion, Dorothea Dudek and the NCI, CCR Fellows Editorial Board for editorial assistance, Drs. Krista Zanetti and Leah Mechanic for statistical analysis, and Judith A. Weish for help in figure printing. We also thank Drs. Raymond T. Jones, Andrew Borkowski, and Mark J. Krasna at the University of Maryland and Baltimore Veterans Administration for pathological diagnosis and sample collection as well as Audrey Salabes for interviewing. Analyses were performed using BRB-ArrayTools
developed by Dr. Richard Simon and Amy Peng Lam. This research was suported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research. This work was supported in part by grant CA76259 to C.M.C. and by federal funds from the National Cancer Institute,
National Institute of Health, under contract number NO1-CO-12400 to R.M.S. N.Y. is supported by the Uehara Memorial Foundation of Japan.

Received: June 10, 2005
Revised: October 28, 2005
Accepted: January 23, 2006
Published: March 13, 2006

References

Ambros, V. (2003). MicroRNA pathways in flies and worms: Growth, death, fat, stress, and timing. Cell 113, 673–676.

Baskerville, S., and Bartel, D.P. (2005). Microarray profiling of microRNAs reveals frequent coexpression with neighboring miRNAs and host genes. RNA 11, 241–247.

Bulavin, D.V., Demidov, O.N., Saito, S., Kauraniemi, P., Phillips, C., Amundson, S.A., Ambrosino, C., Sauter, G., Nebreda, A.R., Anderson, C.W., et al. (2002). Amplification of PPM1D in human tumors abrogates p53 tumor-suppressor activity. Nat. Genet. 31, 210–215.

Bulavin, D.V., Phillips, C., Nannenga, B., Timofeev, O., Donehower, L.A., Anderson, C.W., Appella, E., and Fornace, A.J., Jr. (2004). Inactivation of the Wip1 phosphatase inhibits mammary tumorigenesis through p38 MAPK-mediated activation of the p16(Ink4a)-p19(Arf) pathway. Nat. Genet. 36, 343–350.

Calin, G.A., Dumitru, C.D., Shimizu, M., Bichi, R., Zupo, S., Noch, E., Aldler, H., Rattan, S., Keating, M., Rai, K., et al. (2002). Frequent deletions and down-regulation of micro-RNA genes miR15 and miR16 at 13q14 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 15524–15529.

Calin, G.A., Liu, C.G., Sevignani, C., Ferracin, M., Felli, N., Dumitru, C.D., Shimizu, M., Cimmino, A., Zupo, S., Dono, M., et al. (2004a). MicroRNA profiling reveals distinct signatures in B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemias. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 11755–11760.

Calin, G.A., Sevignani, C., Dumitru, C.D., Hyslop, T., Noch, E., Yendamuri, S., Shimizu, M., Rattan, S., Bullrich, F., Negrini, M., and Croce, C.M. (2004b). Human microRNA genes are frequently located at fragile sites and genomic regions involved in cancers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 2999–3004.

Calin, G.A., Ferracin, M., Cimmino, A., Di Leva, G., Shimizu, M., Wojcik, S.E., Iorio, M.V., Visone, R., Sever, N.I., Fabbri, M., et al. (2005). A microRNA signature associated with prognosis and progression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 353, 1793–1801.

Chan, J.A., Krichevsky, A.M., and Kosik, K.S. (2005). MicroRNA-21 is an anti-apoptotic factor in human glioblastoma cells. Cancer Res. 65, 6029–6033.

Eberharter, A., and Becker, P.B. (2002). Histone acetylation: a switch between repressive and permissive chromatin. Second in review series on chromatin dynamics. EMBO Rep. 3, 224–229.

Eis, P.S., Tam, W., Sun, L., Chadburn, A., Li, Z., Gomez, M.F., Lund, E., and Dahlberg, J.E. (2005). Accumulation of miR-155 and BIC RNA in human B cell lymphomas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 3627–3632.

Granville, C.A., and Dennis, P.A. (2005). An overview of lung cancer genomics and proteomics. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 32, 169–176.

Gregory, R.I., and Shiekhattar, R. (2005). MicroRNA biogenesis and cancer. Cancer Res. 65, 3509–3512.

Hayashita, Y., Osada, H., Tatematsu, Y., Yamada, H., Yanagisawa, K., Tomida, S., Yatabe, Y., Kawahara, K., Sekido, Y., and Takahashi, T. (2005). A polycistronic microRNA cluster, miR-17-92, is overexpressed in human lung cancers and enhances cell proliferation. Cancer Res. 65, 9628–9632.

He, L., Thomson, J.M., Hemann, M.T., Hernando-Monge, E., Mu, D., Goodson, S., Powers, S., Cordon-Cardo, C., Lowe, S.W., Hannon, G.J., and Hammond, S.M. (2005). A microRNA polycistron as a potential human oncogene. Nature 435, 828–833.

Hutvagner, G., and Zamore, P.D. (2002). A microRNA in a multiple-turnover RNAi enzyme complex. Science 297, 2056–2060.

Iorio, M.V., Ferracin, M., Liu, C.G., Veronese, A., Spizzo, R., Sabbioni, S., Magri, E., Pedriali, M., Fabbri, M., Campiglio, M., et al. (2005). MicroRNA gene expression deregulation in human breast cancer. Cancer Res. 65, 7065–7070.

John, B., Enright, A.J., Aravin, A., Tuschl, T., Sander, C., and Marks, D.S. (2004). Human microRNA targets. PLoS Biol. 2, e363. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020363.

Johnson, S.M., Grosshans, H., Shingara, J., Byrom, M., Jarvis, R., Cheng, A., Labourier, E., Reinert, K.L., Brown, D., and Slack, F.J. (2005). RAS is regulated by the let-7 microRNA family. Cell 120, 635–647.

Jones, P.A., and Baylin, S.B. (2002). The fundamental role of epigenetic events in cancer. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3, 415–428.

Karube, Y., Tanaka, H., Osada, H., Tomida, S., Tatematsu, Y., Yanagisawa, K., Yatabe, Y., Takamizawa, J., Miyoshi, S., Mitsudomi, T., and Takahashi, T. (2005). Reduced expression of Dicer associated with poor prognosis in lung cancer patients. Cancer Sci. 96, 111–115.

Krek, A., Grun, D., Poy, M.N., Wolf, R., Rosenberg, L., Epstein, E.J., MacMenamin, P., da Piedade, I., Gunsalus, K.C., Stoffel, M., and Rajewsky, N. (2005). Combinatorial microRNA target predictions. Nat. Genet. 37, 495–500.

Lagos-Quintana, M., Rauhut, R., Lendeckel, W., and Tuschl, T. (2001). Identification of novel genes coding for small expressed RNAs. Science 294,853–858.

Lau, N.C., Lim, L.P., Weinstein, E.G., and Bartel, D.P. (2001). An abundant class of tiny RNAs with probable regulatory roles in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 294, 858–862.

Lee, R.C., and Ambros, V. (2001). An extensive class of small RNAs in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 294, 862–864.

Lee, Y., Jeon, K., Lee, J.T., Kim, S., and Kim, V.N. (2002). MicroRNA maturation: stepwise processing and subcellular localization. EMBO J. 21, 4663–4670.

Lee, Y., Ahn, C., Han, J., Choi, H., Kim, J., Yim, J., Lee, J., Provost, P., Radmark, O., Kim, S., and Kim, V.N. (2003). The nuclear RNase III Drosha initiates microRNA processing. Nature 425, 415–419.

Lewis, B.P., Shih, I.H., Jones-Rhoades, M.W., Bartel, D.P., and Burge, C.B. (2003). Prediction of mammalian microRNA targets. Cell 115, 787–798.

Lewis, B.P., Burge, C.B., and Bartel, D.P. (2005). Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell 120, 15–20.

Liu, C.G., Calin, G.A., Meloon, B., Gamliel, N., Sevignani, C., Ferracin, M., Dumitru, C.D., Shimizu, M., Zupo, S., Dono, M., et al. (2004). An oligonucleotide microchip for genome-wide microRNA profiling in human and mouse tissues. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 9740–9744.

Lu, J., Getz, G., Miska, E.A., Alvarez-Saavedra, E., Lamb, J., Peck, D., Sweet-Cordero, A., Ebert, B.L., Mak, R.H., Ferrando, A.A., et al. (2005). MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers. Nature 435, 834–838.

McManus, M.T. (2003). MicroRNAs and cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol. 13,253–258.

Metzler, M., Wilda, M., Busch, K., Viehmann, S., and Borkhardt, A. (2004). High expression of precursor microRNA-155/BIC RNA in children with Burkitt lymphoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 39, 167–169.

Meyerson, M., and Carbone, D. (2005). Genomic and proteomic profiling of lung cancers: lung cancer classification in the age of targeted therapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 3219–3226.

Michael, M.Z., O’Connor, S.M., van Holst Pellekaan, N.G., Young, G.P., and James, R.J. (2003). Reduced accumulation of specific microRNAs in colo-rectal neoplasia. Mol. Cancer Res. 1, 882–891.

Minna, J.D., Roth, J.A., and Gazdar, A.F. (2002). Focus on lung cancer. Cancer Cell 1, 49–52.

Parker, L.H., Schmidt, M., Jin, S.W., Gray, A.M., Beis, D., Pham, T., Frantz, G., Palmieri, S., Hillan, K., Stainier, D.Y., et al. (2004). The endothelial-cell-derived secreted factor Egfl7 regulates vascular tube formation. Nature 428, 754–758.

Rodriguez, A., Griffiths-Jones, S., Ashurst, J.L., and Bradley, A. (2004). Identification of mammalian microRNA host genes and transcription units. Genome Res. 14, 1902–1910.

Schmittgen, T.D., Jiang, J., Liu, Q., and Yang, L. (2004). A high-throughput method to monitor the expression of microRNA precursors. Nucleic Acids Res. 32,e43.

Sekido, Y., Fong, K.M., and Minna, J.D. (2003). Molecular genetics of lung cancer. Annu. Rev. Med. 54, 73–87.

Storey, J.D., and Tibshirani, R. (2003). Statistical significance for genome-wide studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9440–9445.

Takamizawa, J., Konishi, H., Yanagisawa, K., Tomida, S., Osada, H., Endoh, H., Harano, T., Yatabe, Y., Nagino, M., Nimura, Y., et al. (2004). Reduced expression of the let-7 microRNAs in human lung cancers in association with shortened postoperative survival. Cancer Res. 64, 3753–3756.

Tam, W., Hughes, S.H., Hayward, W.S., and Besmer, P. (2002). Avian bic, a gene isolated from a common retroviral site in avian leukosis virus-induced lymphomas that encodes a noncoding RNA, cooperates with c-myc in lymphomagenesis and erythroleukemogenesis. J. Virol. 76, 4275–4286.

Travis, W.D., E. Brambilla, C.C. Harris, and H.K. Muller-Hermelink, eds. (2004). World Health Organization Classification of Tumours, Pathology and Genetics: Tumours of the Lung, Pleura, Thymus and Heart (Lyon: IARC Press), pp. 12–15.

Yi, R., Qin, Y., Macara, I.G., and Cullen, B.R. (2003). Exportin-5 mediates the nuclear export of pre-microRNAs and short hairpin RNAs. Genes Dev. 17, 3011–3016.

Yi, M., Horton, J.D., Cohen, J.C., Hobbs, H.H., and Stephens, R.M. (2006). WholePathwayScope: a comprehensive pathway-based analysis tool for high-throughput data. BMC Bioinformatics 7,30.

Yokota, J., and Kohno, T. (2004). Molecular footprints of human lung cancer progression. Cancer Sci. 95, 197–204.

Volinia, S., Calin, G.A., Liu, C.G., Ambs, S., Cimmino, A., Petrocca, F., Visone, R., Iorio, M., Roldo, C., Ferracin, M., et al. (2006). A microRNA expression signature of human solid tumors defines cancer gene targets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 2257–2261.




Accession numbers
All microarray data were submitted to the ArrayExpress database, and the accession number is E-TABE-22.



NetworkEditor's Perspective: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Deficiency Disease ?

This very finely analyzed study by Nozomu Yanaihara, Natasha Caplen, Elise Bowman, Masahiro Seike, Kensuke Kumamoto, Ming Yi, Robert M. Stephens, Aikou Okamoto, Jun Yokota, Tadao Tanaka, George Adrian Calin, Chang-Gong Liu, Carlo M. Croce, and Curtis C. Harris, sheds new light on the possibility that non-small cell lung carcinoma  (NSCLC) may be as simple as a vitamin -deficiency disease. This concept arose when earlier studies of the lung tissue from NSCLC patients who had been resected many years before showed that patient survival was adversely affected by a deficiency of let-7 RNA species in the pre-operative sample. That study also showed that replenishing let-7 levels in NSCLC cell cultures by administered plasmids returned the in-vitro growth rates of NSCLC cells to normal. A review of the subject suggested that administration of let-7 RNA to NSCLC cells might reprogram the cells toward normality in culture. Interest increased when it was discovered that let-7 micro RNA decreased the activity of RAS oncogenes in cultured cells and neoplasms, and analysis of defined microRNA species for cancer therapy was discussed in many research centers. More recently it was discovered in this study by Yanaihara, N., et al, 2006). , that only one type of let-7 RNA family (hsa-let-7a2 microRNA) is effective in improving the survival of NSCLC patients in retrospective clinical studies, and a new study reveals that a closely-related let-7 RNA (has-let-7a-3) may actually be oncogenic in retrospective studies. The data suggest that the two forms of let-7a may interact with each other in vivo, but no data on this possibility is yet available.

In 1963, De Carvalho showed that transfusion of normal total bone marrow RNA from human volunteers resulted in clinical and marrow responses in 3 patients with acute myelogenous leukemia in relapse.

Additional References:

1. Takamizawa, J., Konishi, H., Yanagisawa, K., Tomida, S., Osada, H., Endoh, H., Harano, T., Yatabe, Y., Nagino, M., Nimura, Y., Mitsudomi T,  and Takahashi T,  (2004). Reduced expression of the let-7 microRNAs in human lung cancers in association with shortened postoperative survival. Cancer Res. 64, 3753–3756.

2. Hovsepian JA, and Frenster JH, "Reprogramming as an Approach to Neoplasms".

3. Johnson, S.M., Grosshans, H., Shingara, J., Byrom, M., Jarvis, R., Cheng, A., Labourier, E., Reinert, K.L., Brown, D., and Slack, F.J. (2005). RAS is regulated by the let-7 microRNA family. Cell 120, 635–647.

4. Eder M, and Scherr M, "MicroRNA and Lung Cancer".

5. Brueckner B, Stresemann C, Kuner R, Mund C, Musch T, Meister M, Sultmann H, and Lyko F, (2007). The human let-7a-3 locus contains an epigenetically regulated microRNA gene with oncogenic function.
Cancer Res. 67: 1419-1423.

6. DeCarvalho S, "Effect of RNA from Normal Human Marrow on Leukaemic Marrow In-Vivo".




Links to RNA and Biological Causality:



Further Topics in:  Euchromatin,  active DNA, and  RNA  ribo-regulators:

Links to Euchromatin Activator RNA Reviews:
Links to Euchromatin Activator RNA Research:
Links to Ultrastructural Probes of DNase I-Sensitive Sites:
Links to RNA as a Therapeutic Agent:
Links to Hodgkin Lymphoma Immuno-Pathology:
Links to Activated T-Lymphocyte Immunotherapy:
Links to Medical Systems Biology:
Links to Selective Gene Transcription:
Links to RNA-Induced Epigenetics:
Links to RNA-Induced Embryogenesis:
Links to RNA and Biological Causality:
Links to Reprogramming and Neoplasia:

A Brief History of Activator RNA:

"Ultrastructural Probes of Active DNA Sites, and the RNA Activators of DNA". (PowerPoint Presentation).




Top of Page - Euchromatin Network - Current Research - Forums - Other Sites - Future Events -


For Further Information and Feedback:
E-mail: frenster@euchromatin.net
Phone:  +1 650 367 6483
Fax:  +1 650 364 1773


euchromatin: "the most active portion of the genome within the cell nucleus".